When the word “alien” is used to classify an individual, it is inaccurate, silly, and downright disrespectful. On one hand, it brings to mind science fiction fodder from the 1950\u2014bulbous heads with tubular arms bearing \u201cWe come in peace\u201d banners. It\u2019s disrespectful, obviously, because it reduces a human being, no better than you or I, to this cheap, cartoon visual.\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/p>\n
The history of the term begins unexpectedly. This now-offensive term was once used to supplant a much more offensive one.\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/p>\n
In the 70s, \u201ca group of Chicano UCLA students [\u2026] suggest[ed] the [LA Times] use the term illegal alien. They were responding to an editorial in the publication whose title referred to people who’d crossed illegally from Mexico as wetbacks.\u201d So for a period, the term was a politically correct answer to what now seems like an archaic and particularly nasty slur (that reputable newspapers would publish without a thought) <\/p>\n
So in the 80\u2019s, when politicians like Ronald Reagan were using the term, it didn\u2019t strike people as offensive as it does now. According to NPR, it wasn\u2019t until the 90\u2019s that the phrase started becoming associated with bigotry.\t Despite this current understanding that the term is outdated, it is prominently linked to political, right-wing rhetoric. <\/p>\n
Politicians like Ted Cruz and Donald Trump coupling the words \u201cillegal alien\u201d with the word \u201ccriminal,\u201d (NPR) as an antecedent or vice-versa. They are essentially labeling a voiceless people in a way that the people themselves don\u2019t determine.<\/p>\n
The current political climate in which the term \u201cillegal alien\u201d has an insidious relevancy is interesting when compared to the Peet article. It describes the avenues and roadblocks a Dartmouth student navigated in her quest to remove \u201cillegal alien\u201d as a subject heading with the Library of Congress. While researching, the student noticed that many inflammatory readings about non-citizens were found under the heading \u201cillegal alien.\u201d<\/p>\n
The student took her concerns with the heading to a rights group for the undocumented students at Dartmouth. From there, the bipartisan group took the student\u2019s concerns to librarians at Dartmouth. The librarians advised that the group would have to take it up with the Library of Congress directly. What follows was a description that, frankly, painted the Library of Congress as an impenetrable and hierarchical force at best. On the more extreme side, an absolute, perhaps harsher interpretation might cast LC as sometimes-protector of the hegemony. <\/p>\n
After six grueling months of waiting, the Library of Congress finally got back to Dartmouth students, denying the change. The LC memo stated that the terms \u201cillegal alien\u201d and \u201cundocumented immigrant\u201d were not interchangeable. In their eyes, the connotation for each phrase was different. <\/p>\n
Then, after what seems like relatively small pressure from ALA and civil rights groups, the Library of Congress relented. They changed the heading to \u201cnon-citizen\u201d\u2026for three months, at least. After that short span, Republicans (specifically) tried to stop this. \t<\/p>\n
One Republican senator from Tennessee (neighbor to my own home state, Alabama) even went so far as to say the name-change would cost taxpayers frivolously, and therefore would not have been worth pursuing. As if using more thoughtful words wouldn\u2019t lead to a more uniform, thoughtful community benefiting everyone…<\/p>\n
The bill was ultimately passed, then denied, and is now currently up in limbo. The end of the Library Journal article is optimistic. It highlights the enterprising Dartmouth student, a former undocumented individual who is now a modern incarnation of civil rights hero. The article champions individuals like her, and as readers we are implicitly encouraged to follow suit. \t\t\t<\/p>\n
Despite the bill not passing by the time of the article\u2019s publication, the work done by the students was still necessary. The publicity generated by their efforts makes \u201cillegal alien\u201d seem even more antediluvian and backwards, further discourages thoughtful people (most of us, in my opinion) from using it. Any publicity, if it encourages less usage of this word, will paint researchers who use this tag as insensitive, pressuring everyone to use it less in every capacity, unless trying to incite (like insensitive, topical politicians of the day).\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tIn short, I don\u2019t think anyone who matters is going to be using this term.\t\t\t\t<\/p>\n
Both words in the label \u201cillegal alien\u201d are propaganda. “Illegal” implies criminal activity even when none occured. “Alien” is a particularly cartoonish way of saying an object doesn\u2019t belong. It is not just propaganda, but it is immoral propaganda. \t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/p>\n
This reminded me of the struggles for more apt representation (or representation at all) in the Library of Congress subject headings outlined in the Drabinski readings. “Lesbian” finally got validation from LC as a subject heading in 1976. The dynamics of power, of literally waiting for the hegemony to realize that a disrespect is taking place, and then waiting on them to care enough to change it, is relevant in the Dartmouth case as well. When a dominant class is put in charge of defining a less-influential other, they are only going to approach this task with the limited understanding they bring to the table. <\/p>\n
The Drabinski article was about how people are limited by their biases, whether they realize it or not. Even when the defenders of these inaccurate subject headings are in the wrong, they often don\u2019t seem to realize or spend too much time defending instead of just realizing the new for something new and more respectful. If harmful language can exist in libraries, those hallowed places idealized by Madison and Jefferson, then what hope is there for the drastically more-chaotic spaces outside of it?<\/p>\n
Above all else, we just have to ask people and understand what they feel comfortable being called. Why is that so hard?<\/p>\n
Drabinski, E. (2013). Queering the Catalog: Queer Theory and the Politics of Correction. The \tLibrary Quarterly: Information, Community, Policy, 83(2), 94-111. Retrieved February 20, 2017, from https:\/\/lms.pratt.edu\/<\/p>\n
Greene, D. (2015, August 19). The Evolution Of The Immigration Term: Alien. Retrieved \tFebruary 20, \t2017, from http:\/\/www.npr.org\/templates\/transcript\/<\/p>\n
Peet, L. (2016). LC Drops “Illegal Alien” Subject Heading. Library Journal, 141(11), 12-13. <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
When the word “alien” is used to classify an individual, it is inaccurate, silly, and downright disrespectful. On one hand, it brings to mind science fiction fodder from the 1950\u2014bulbous heads with tubular arms bearing \u201cWe come in peace\u201d banners. It\u2019s disrespectful, obviously, because it reduces a human being, no better than you or I, […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":300,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[4],"tags":[112,144,185,209],"class_list":["post-2281","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-field-reports","tag-information","tag-listheory","tag-public-libraries","tag-subject-heading"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/studentwork.prattsi.org\/foundations\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2281","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/studentwork.prattsi.org\/foundations\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/studentwork.prattsi.org\/foundations\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/studentwork.prattsi.org\/foundations\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/300"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/studentwork.prattsi.org\/foundations\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2281"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/studentwork.prattsi.org\/foundations\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2281\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/studentwork.prattsi.org\/foundations\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2281"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/studentwork.prattsi.org\/foundations\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2281"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/studentwork.prattsi.org\/foundations\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2281"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}